This measure is widely used to assess the detectability of an imperative stimulus in a manner independent of a given individual’s response criteria, or fluctuations therein. d-prime is computed by taking into account the probability of Pictilisib mw correctly responding to targets when a target is present and the probability of incorrectly initiating a response in the absence of a target (Green & Swets, 1966). To assess the time-course of oscillatory power changes in the alpha band during our cued-attention task, TSE waveforms were computed (Foxe et al., 1998). TSE waveforms provide a robust
measure of induced oscillatory power changes (i.e. changes in amplitude of rhythmic activity in which phase varies randomly from trial to trial). The computation of the TSE waveforms in the present study took the following course: (i) Individual trials were bandpass-filtered from 8 to 14 Hz (fourth-order digital Butterworth, zero-phase); (ii) the analytic representation of the bandpass-filtered trials were acquired
by applying the Hilbert transform; (iii) the absolute value of the analytic representation of each trial was taken as a measure of the instantaneous amplitude in the alpha band across the trial; and (iv) trials in each condition were averaged. RT and d-prime accuracy were analysed using a repeated-measures anova with Trial (switch vs. repeat) and Task Modality (visual vs. auditory) as within-subject factors. TSE measures were analysed using the mean amplitude across nine electrode sites over frontopolar (D4/D5/D6/D11/D12/D13/C28/C29/C30 in the Biosemi labeling convention) TGF-beta inhibitor and parieto-occipital (A15/A16/A17/A21/A22/A23/A28/A29/A30) scalp regions during an early (700–900 ms) and a late (1100–1300 ms) phase of anticipatory preparatory activity. As a first step, our analyses detailed the time-course and topographic distribution of oscillatory power changes in the alpha band associated with task-set reconfiguration. This was accomplished by a repeated-measures anova with factors Modality (visual vs. auditory),
Trial (switch vs. Leukotriene-A4 hydrolase repeat), Time (early vs. late) and Scalp Region (frontopolar vs. parieto-occipital). If a significant Modality × Trial interaction was found, our second step was to run two protected anovas, one testing task-set reconfiguration between and one within modalities in order to unpack the interaction. For the between-modalities anova, we tested the time-course and strength of alpha power deployment contrasting switch-auditory against switch-visual trials and repeat-auditory against repeat-visual trials. The between modalities anova considers alpha power deployment associated with task-set reconfiguration and differences therein between Switch and Repeat trials. For the within-modality anova we tested time-course and strength of alpha power deployment contrasting switch-auditory against repeat-auditory trials as well as switch-visual against repeat-visual trials.