Therefore, the zeta potential of non-spherical nanomaterials may be overestimated by up to 20% [15]. Table 1 Comparison of the physical characteristics of the carbon nanoparticles   GNS NG ND C60 MWNT Shape Nanosheet Spherical nanoparticle Spherical nanoparticle Spherical nanoparticle Multi-wall tube Size

6 to 8 nm/15 μm 3 to 4 nm 3 to 4 nm Approximately 50 nm (aggregates) 8 nm/5 to 20 μm Atom configuration sp 2 sp 2 sp 3 sp 2 sp 2 Purity >99.5% >93% >95% >99.5% >95% Zeta potential (mV) −3.83 28.7 −39.3 −38.0 −14.8 Specific surface area 120 to 150 m2/g 540 to 650 m2/g Approximately 282 m2/g 0.07 to 0.17 m2/ga >500 m2/g Production buy CFTRinh-172 Exfoliated Explosion Explosion Arc discharge Catalytic CVD Purity and specific surface area (except C60) were provided by the manufacturer. The size was provided by the manufacturer and examined with a transmission electron microscope. Zeta potential was examined with Zetasizer Nano-ZS90. GNS, graphene nanosheet; NG, graphite nanoparticle; ND, diamond nanoparticle; C60,

fullerene C60; MWNT, multi-wall nanotube; CVD, chemical vapour deposition. aTaken from Cheng et al. [16]. Figure 1 Transmission electron microscopic images of carbon nanomaterials. (A) GNS, (B) NG, (C) ND, (D) C60 and (E) MWNT. CAM assay CAM implants were made from sterile Waterman filter paper with a diameter of 10 mm. Water (control) or hydrocolloids of nanoparticles of a concentration of 500 mg/L were added to the implants (final amount of nanoparticles on the implant was 0.01

mg). The implants were pre-treated with learn more 3 mg/mL of hydrocortisone sodium succinate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and air dried under sterile conditions. Fertilised eggs from Ross line 308 hens were obtained from a certified hatchery and kept for 4 days at 12°C. The eggs were cleaned, sterilised with UVC light and divided into six groups (6 × Molecular motor 20 eggs). Embryos were incubated at standard conditions (temperature 37°C, humidity 60% and turned once per hour). Embryonic day 0 (E0) started when the eggs were placed into the incubator. At day E6, small holes (1 cm2) were made on the shell above air space, the inner membrane was VX-680 ic50 gently stripped off, and the implants were placed on CAM. The chicken embryos were incubated until day 7 of embryonic development, when implants with CAM were prefixed with 1.5 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde. After 30 min of incubation at 4°C, CAM with implants were cut out and fixed at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde for 60 min (total fixation time, 90 min). After fixation, the implants were gently stripped off. All measurements were repeated three times minimum. CAM tissue angiogenesis analysis The methodology of quantifying blood vessel development was based on [17] and [18], validated and used for this investigation. CAM tissues from implants were investigated with a stereomicroscope under a 12.5-fold magnification (SZX10, CellD software version 3.