The median change in sedimentation rates by the end of the 20th century is about 50% greater than background. Although increased sedimentation often CAL-101 clinical trial corresponds with greater land use intensities, any such relation is highly inconsistent among the catchments. For example, there are lakes for which sedimentation rates have steadily increased to over double their background rate without corresponding increases in land use (Arbor, Beta, Farewell, and Justine lakes), and there are lakes for

which sedimentation rates have decreased or have been nearly flat while land use activities have greatly increased (e.g. Cataract, Jakes, and Sugsaw lakes). Sedimentation trends are approximately linear for a large number of lake catchments. Curvilinear and spiked patterns are also observed in the sediment records, with nonlinear increases in sedimentation only occasionally coinciding with temporal http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Temsirolimus.html patterns of land use (Fig. 4). Sedimentation rates have accelerated in the late 20th century for Boomerang, Chisholm, Mitten, Pentz, and Pitoney lakes despite dramatically different trends in land use. Distinctive spikes in sedimentation to over triple the background rate occurred at the onset of land use or during periods of intense land use in Elizabeth and Maggie lakes, while similar episodic sedimentation conversely occurred in the absence of land use or preceding

land use in Haney and Octopus lakes. The best mixed-effects model relating sedimentation (log transformed) to our watershed variables ( Table 1) obtained through our stepwise procedure included roads_no_buf, cuts_no_buf, and temp_closed variables as fixed effects Tyrosine-protein kinase BLK and their interactions with catchment as random effects ( Table 3). Random effect parameters show that there is high variability between lake sedimentation rates, both for intercept and slope coefficients. Residual variability in log(sedimentation) is ±0.44 times the background sedimentation rate for about two thirds of the lake catchments. Positive fixed effect estimates for the model intercept, as well as with roads_no_buf, cuts_no_buf, and temp_closed, indicate that higher rates

of sedimentation correspond to the post-1952 period in the absence of recorded environmental change, as well as to greater whole-catchment road and cut densities and higher temperatures during the closed water season. The relation with sedimentation change is most significant for road density, intermediate for temperature change, and least significant for forest clearing. For the Foothills-Alberta Plateau catchments that experienced forestry and energy extraction land uses, subsetted model results are similar to those obtained for the full catchment inventory. Positive fixed effect estimates for the intercept, land use densities (all types), and temperature suggest that higher sedimentation rates correspond to the post-1952 period, higher densities of land use, and warmer temperatures.