Dextrose solution was transfused continuously throughout the period of study. Periodically, 1 ml of blood sample was taken by syringe containing 1 ml of heparin solution to prevent blood clotting. These blood samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for about 30 min. One milliliter of the supernatant was taken, and after suitable dilution, analyzed at 362 nm spectrophotometrically by the method described under in vitro analysis. The optimized formulations (AF4 and AT5) were selected and the stability studies were carried out at accelerated condition

of 40 ± 2 °C, 75 ± 5% RH conditions, stored in desiccators, the formulations were packed in amber color screw cap container and kept in above-said condition for period of 3 months. The formulations were analyzed periodically for their physical appearance, buccoadhesive

strength and in vitro drug release. The FTIR spectra of Amiloride hydrochloride, HPMC, MK-2206 supplier SCMC, Eudragit, Carbopol, Chitosan and PVP and the combination of drug and polymers showed no significant interaction between drug and polymer. The spectral data of pure drug and various drug-excipient mixtures are tested. The results indicate that there was no chemical incompatibility between drug and excipients used in the formulation. The surface pH of the formulations was determined in order to find out the possibility of any side effects in buccal environment. The observed surface pH of the formulations was found to be in the range of 5.82–6.52. The results shown that there of is no significant difference in the surface pH of all the formulations and the pH range lies within the range of salivary pH, i.e. 6.5–6.8, thereby not causing irritation in the Selleckchem Dabrafenib site of administration. Buccoadhesive strength of buccal films is shown in Fig. 1 and swelling index of buccal tablets is shown in

Fig. 2. The stability study of the optimized formulation was done in natural human saliva. The films did not exhibit any significant changes in their color, shape and had satisfactory physical stability. Carbopol, being an anionic polymer, gives the highest buccoadhesive force. The buccoadhesive strength exhibited by Amiloride hydrochloride buccal films was satisfactory for maintaining them in oral cavity. The combination of HPMC and CP shows good adhesion. Upon addition of PVP, the buccoadhesive strength increases which may be due to hydrogen bond formation and Vander Waals forces. Swelling of buccal tablets at different time intervals shown in Fig. 3. Data of in vitro release were fit into different equations and kinetic models to explain the release kinetics of Amiloride hydrochloride from the buccal tablets. The kinetic models used were a zero-order equation, Higuchi’s model and Peppa’s models. The obtained results in these formulations were plotted in various model treatments as cumulative percentage release of drug versus square root of time (Higuchi’s) and log cumulative percentage release versus log time (Peppas).