It is a “carbapenemase,” one of a diverse group of enzymes that can degrade carbapenems, the most powerful members of the β-lactam antibiotic class.2 The media furor over NDM-1 was sparked by epidemiological evidence that many, though not all, patients affected in the UK had traveled to, or had healthcare contact in the Indian subcontinent,3 where the enzyme is distributed among many bacterial species.4 It was further fueled by the initial response in India; political and media campaigns over the
naming of the new enzyme served to polarize attitudes, and attention moved away from the real issue, of the threat to public health and modern medicine. Multi-resistance, including that shown by bacteria with NDM-1 carbapenemase, undermines selleckchem the effectiveness of antibiotics, reduces our ability to treat infections effectively, and Depsipeptide mouse so causes increased mortality. This issue includes three papers that address different aspects of the resistance/travel conjunction. First, Peirano et al.5 extend the previous work done in Calgary, Canada,6 to show the link between carriage of E coli with CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and travel, especially to either India or Africa. The cohort studied was not screened
before travel, so some may already have been colonized, but the difference (>five-fold) between carriage by travelers and non-travelers was significant. India is known to have an extremely high prevalence of ESBL-producing MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit E coli,7 and a recent Swedish study confirmed similar high rates of acquisition by prescreened volunteers after travel to India.8 Longitudinal studies are needed to follow up such cohorts and to determine the length of carriage of resistant strains, the proportion of colonized patients who go on to develop infections and, although more difficult to achieve, the extent
of transfer of resistance genes to other strains in their gut flora. In the second paper, Hussenet et al.9 present three case reports of infections caused by multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in patients repatriated to France from hospitals in Algeria, Thailand, and Turkey. This species is also a significant pathogen or colonist of casualties repatriated to Europe and the United States from conflict zones.10 Since, as the third paper by Lepelletier et al.11 stresses, resistant bacteria have no respect for international boundaries, we must take steps to limit the consequences of spread. These must include (1) prompt and accurate detection in the diagnostic laboratory (phenotypic methods and molecular diagnostics); (2) appropriate treatment of infected patients; (3) screening to define the extent of onwards transmission (carriage or infection); and (4) implementation of infection control procedures to limit further spread and, ideally, to remove the problem.