One block consisted of ten 32-s

trials The middle third

One block consisted of ten 32-s

trials. The middle third of each tracking pattern was repeated and identical across practice and retention (Boyd & Linsdell, 2009). The pattern was unknown to the participants and was constructed from the polynomial equation described by Wulf & Schmidt (1997) with the following general form: The middle (repeated) segment was constructed by using the same coefficients for every trial (b0 = 2.0, a1=−4.0, b1 = 3.0, b2=−3.6, a3 = 3.9, b3 = 4.5, a4 = 0.0, b4 = 1.0, a5=−3.8, b5=−0.5, a6 = 1.0 and b6 = 2.5). The first and third segments of the tracking pattern were generated randomly using coefficients ranging from −5.0 to 5.0. A different random sequence was used for both the first and third segments of every trial. There were 10 separate reversals in the direction CYC202 cell line in each third of the tracking pattern. The random and repeated patterns were equated for difficulty by ensuring that the overall excursion of each random sequence fell within a range of that required by the repeated

sequence. Neither the trajectories of the target nor the participants’ movements left a visible train on the screen and thus participants could not visualize the entire pattern. The same sets of trials were practised by all of the participants to ensure uniformity so that the random segments were the same for each participant. Participants were not informed of the repeating sequence but were instructed daily to track the target as accurately as possible by controlling the position of the cursor with the joystick. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered find more with a Magstim Super Rapid2 stimulator using a 70-mm figure-of-eight air-cooled coil (Magstim Company Ltd., Whitland, UK). Participants were seated in a semi-reclined dental chair with their arms bent and supported by armrests. The TMS coil was orientated tangentially to the scalp with the handle at 45° to the midline in a posterior lateral orientation. Prior to the experiment, high-resolution anatomical magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were acquired for each participant (TR = 12.4 ms, TE = 5.4 ms, flip

angle θ = 35°, FOV = 256 mm, 170 slices, 1-mm thickness) at the UBC MRI Research Centre on a Philips Achieva 3.0 T whole body MRI scanner (Phillips Healthcare, Andover, MD, USA) using a sensitivity encoding head coil (SENSE). These images were then imported into the BrainSight™ TMS neuronavigation software (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate (BrainSight 2.0, Rogue Research Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) to allow for stereotaxic registration of the TMS coil with the participants’ anatomy for online control of coil positioning during each session and across days. Surface electromyography over the participants’ right flexor carpi radialis (FCR) was monitored using the evoked potential unit of the Super Rapid2 control unit (Magstim Company, Ltd) (Boyd & Linsdell, 2009). Initially, the FCR representation was marked on the participants’ anatomical MRI as the medial edge of the left ‘hand knob’.

Comments are closed.