Sanchez, BS, Norland — a CooperSurgical Company, Socorro, NM Bone density assessment by DXA compares attenuation in soft tissue to attenuation in hard tissue data points. When examining hip bone density in subjects with relatively low bone density and LY2109761 higher fat content,

bone point attenuation may approach attenuation similar to that seen in baseline soft tissue producing erosion of bone within the study. Analysis software can avoid these errors by making different regional soft tissue selections. In extreme cases, specialized setting of the soft tissue region can produce the more correct assessment of hip bone density. This study compared hip bone density analysis in subjects with low bone density and a higher or lower baseline fat content

using standard and specialized analysis software. FDA-approved Drug Library concentration Analysis of total hip, trochanter and femur neck bone mineral content, area and bone density and total hip fat and lean mass was completed in two groups of 20 subjects with relatively low bone density. Analysis used algorithms that applied a global sample of soft tissue (Alternate-r Enabled) or a more selective sampling of soft tissue (Alternate-r Disabled). Group 1 was made up of 20 subjects with a majority of soft tissue being fat (56.2 ± 3.6 %) and Group 2 was made up of 20 subjects with less soft tissue being fat (41.3 ± 5.3 %). Significant difference between the analysis modes was determined by paired t-test analysis of variance. As expected analysis of Group 1 subjects with the Alternate-r Enabled showed erosion of bone below the soft tissue baseline while analysis with Alternate-r Disabled allowed better separation of bone from soft tissue. T-test selleck products analysis showed

a significant (p < 0.001) difference between all Group 1 analyses with Alternate-r Enabled and Alternate-r Disabled (Disabled results being between 127 % and 202 % of Enabled results). When Group 2 subjects were analyzed with the Alternate-r Enabled no subject showed erosion of bone below the soft tissue baseline but T-test analysis did show a significant difference in means between the analysis modes for Total BMD (p < 0.016), BMC (p < 0.018) and Area (p < 0.002). Nonetheless, little difference was seen with Disabled results in all Group 2 studies being between 99.6 % and 102.5 % of Enabled results. The data show that DXA analysis of bone is sensitive to surrounding fat tissue and that while in most cases a simple global sampling of soft tissue will produce a reasonable measurement some cases will benefit from a more selective sampling of soft tissue. P4 Screening for Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Men Patsi Albright, MSN, DNP-c, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Harrisburg, PA Background: HIV-infected patients are living longer and are developing low bone mineral density (BMD) that contributes to the development of osteopenia and osteoporosis at an increased rate compared to the general population.