The fact that all three IFN expression plasmids induced similar levels of ISG transcripts at the muscle injection site, suggests that similar amounts of IFNa1, IFNc and IFNb were produced by the muscle cells.

In contrast, only IFNb and IFNc plasmids induced antiviral genes in head kidney, liver and heart. The lack of induction of antiviral genes by IFNa1 plasmid injection is not due to lack of effect of IFNa1 on head kidney cells, since recombinant IFNa1 and IFNc induced similar levels of ISG transcripts in head kidney leucocytes. These results thus suggest that IFNc and IFNb are distributed through the circulation and induce antiviral genes systemically in the fish while IFNa is only active at the production site. During a virus infection, IFNa is thus probably mainly important at the virus infection site while IFNc and IFNb may be distributed systemically and trigger synthesis of antiviral proteins in cells throughout Fluorouracil mw the fish body. In this context IFNc appears to be a main player in innate antiviral responses of Atlantic salmon since GW-572016 it is produced by a variety of cell types, is induced by both viral dsRNA and ssRNA analogs and has equally strong antiviral activity as IFNa1 [8]. While IFNb is also distributed systemically, it has less antiviral activity than IFNa and IFNc,

is produced mainly by specialized leukocytes and was mainly induced by the ssRNA analog [8]. The difference in distribution properties of IFNa compared to IFNb and IFNc may have several explanations. The number of disulphide bridges might possibly influence the degradation rate of the IFNs. IFNa is a 2C-IFN, which contains one disulphide bridge, while IFNb and IFNc are 4C-IFNs, which contain two disulphide bridges [21]. However, the isoelectric points of IFNa1 (pI 9.2) and IFNb/IFNc (pI 6.9/pI 5.1) are also quite different and might influence their distribution Florfenicol and degradation properties. The time course study showed that IFNc plasmid induced up-regulation of not only antiviral genes (Mx, ISG15, Viperin, IFIT5), but also genes for receptors of virus RNA (RIG-I, TLR3 and TLR7) in head kidney throughout the 8 week experimental period. This suggests

that fish injected with IFNc plasmid indeed possess increased innate immunity to virus infection compared to fish injected with IFNa1 or control plasmid. Increased expression of Mx and ISG15 protein was confirmed both in liver and heart of IFNc plasmid injected fish 8 weeks after injection. It is thus highly likely that injected IFNc plasmid may continue to provide systemic expression of antiviral genes beyond the 8 weeks experimental period. This finding inspired us to investigate if injection of IFNc plasmid might in fact provide protection of Atlantic salmon against virus infection even at 8 weeks after plasmid injection. For this purpose we chose a high virulent strain of ISAV, which is an orthomyxovirus that causes high mortality in Atlantic salmon presmolts.