Evidence underpinning the assessment process is then provided, co

Evidence underpinning the assessment process is then provided, covering issues such as red flags, history-taking, investigations, and physiotherapy physical examination (including assessment tests and measures). Information to aid in the analysis of assessment findings and design of a treatment plan is then presented. Intervention to address problems linked to osteoporosis (actual or imminent immobility, increased risk

of falling, and post fracture management) is discussed, with approaches including education, advice, exercise, and improving functional ability detailed. A twopage summary of recommendations is provided at the back of the guidelines, with the associated levels of evidence underpinning the recommendations. References for these recommendations are included in the Dutch Guideline on Osteoporosis and Fracture Prevention. “
“The 1998 first edition http://www.selleckchem.com/products/MDV3100.html of Neurological Rehabilitation was a breath of fresh air in its approach which utilised a biomechanical and motor learning framework. The structure of this second edition is fairly similar to the original version. The book is a practical guide primarily for physiotherapists, and may be of interest to physiotherapy students as well as

some other allied health professionals. This revision adds contributions from five highly regarded physiotherapy authors: Phu Hoang, Julie Bernhardt, Anne Moseley, Leanne Hassett, and Colleen Canning. click here The literature has been updated, and there is a welcome use of literature from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. One of the most visible changes has been the addition of many more pictures with patients (and when relevant, therapists). The pictures are highly illustrative, demonstrating various techniques and concepts, and provide ample therapeutic ideas. The first two sections provide general content on movement, and exercise and training, while the third and final section focuses on individual conditions (multiple sclerosis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, etc). There is also an overview of neurorehabilitation outcome measures in the first section. It is difficult

to ascertain the value of these brief outcome measure descriptions when there are now several outstanding web-based platforms that offer Adenylyl cyclase free, up-to-date and comprehensive information on neurorehabilitation outcome measures (eg, Evidence- Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation, ebrsr.com; StrokEngineAssess, strokengine.ca/assess; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence, SCIREProject.com; Rehab Measures Database, rehabmeasures.org; and Evidence- Based Review of Acquired Brain Injury, www.erabi.com). However, for an entry-level clinician, this section may be useful as an introduction to outcome measures, although more experienced clinicians would likely want more details to enhance their utility of the tools (eg, the amount of change needed to be clinically important).

Comments are closed.