The results after being summed up, were divided by the number of surfaces. The state of oral hygiene can be described as either good (OHI index 0–1), sufficient (OHI index 1–2) or bad (OHI index value 2–3). In order to fully visualize and show to the patient the state of oral hygiene, the coloring tablet, containing fuxine was used. Another form of active orthodontic treatment included upper Schwarz plate with screw by Przylipiak and posterior acrylic capping in order to expand anterior part of the arch in patient with total mesiocclusion Target Selective Inhibitor Library in vitro with III Angle class and III canine class bilaterally (Fig. 11). Finally, glossogram was made in order to assess the tongue position [22]. The tongue was

coated with the mixture of stomatological

gel with a drop of 1% solution of gentian violet for proper contrast. On the upper arch of patient, coffee filter was placed. Patient was told to make slow up and down movements with tongue (Fig. 12). The state of oral hygiene was sufficient both in the maxilla and in the mandible with OHI values 1.67 this website and 2.0, respectively. The overall OHI value for both dental arches was 1.83. Out of 6 teeth assessed in the mandible, 2 teeth on the right side (33.33%) had more than 2/3 of surface covered in dental plaque. Out of 6 teeth assessed in the maxilla, 1 tooth (16.67%) had more than 2/3 of surface covered in dental plaque. The position of tongue and the pronunciation of polish sounds m,b,p,r. during spontaneous speech improved in the second patient during orthodontic treatment. In contrast to other patients with Down syndrome, by whom hypotension of muscles is observed, in this case bruxism was

detected. Upper plate by Morales in both patients helped to enhance the position of tongue. It was reported by parents that bruxism diminished and we observed that attrition surfaces were not larger. High prevalence of periodontal disease in patients with Down syndrome was described by many authors [16] and [17]. Our findings are in accordance with check details the results of research done by Al.-Khadra et al. [1], where the majority of patients with Down syndrome had either poor (25%) or fair (66%) oral hygiene status. Lower, yet fairly similar results were obtained by Shyama et al. [26], where the initial value of plaque index in patients with Down syndrome in the age group 11–13 years was 1.69. In the study done by Jokić et al. [27] on Croatian population of disabled children (including those with Down syndrome) the value of OHI index was higher than in our study (ranging from 3.8 to 4.53), indicating significantly poor oral hygiene status. Additionally, in research done on Nigerian children with Down syndrome, 40% of participants had poor oral hygiene [28]. According to many authors, such poor oral hygiene found in patients with Down syndrome might be present due to lack of manual dexterity [26] and [27].