We believe that this method is a pertinent

reconstructive option for extensive defects of the auricular region. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012. “
“We I-BET-762 mw describe a patient with hand radiation injury that was caused by 192Ir radiation source exposure. The cutaneous symptoms that appear after local radiation exposure follow a certain time pattern consisting of the prodromal, manifestation, subacute, chronic, and late stages. Although the clinical characteristics of each stage are well known, limited cases of photographic demonstrations to the progressive local radiation reaction have been reported. We demonstrate characteristics of serial necrotic changes in the fingers after radiation

exposure in photographs. Initially, blisters, mild erythema, and swelling were present in the exposed fingers. However, at 3 years postexposure, total necrosis, severe flexion deformity, and bony exposure were present in the exposed fingers. For restoration of hand function, we performed a transmetacarpal, metacarpophalangeal, and transphalangeal amputation of the second, third, and fourth fingers, respectively. After debridement of the necrotic thumb tissue, a wrap-around free flap from the Afatinib in vitro hallux was performed for thumb reconstruction. At 2 years postoperatively, the free flap survived well and graft bone union had occurred. The patient’s hand function had tuclazepam improved such that he could grip a large object using the reconstructed thumb and the fifth finger. © 2012 Wiley

Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012. “
“The functional impact of obesity on abdominal wall strength after abdominally based autologous reconstruction is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if obesity alters the postoperative abdominal wall strength profile after autologous reconstruction. We prospectively examined abdominal wall strength and function following autologous breast reconstruction between 2005 and 2010. Enrolled patients completed functional testing [upper abdominal strength (UA), lower abdominal strength (LA), and functional independence measure (FIM)] and psychometric testing utilizing the short form 36 (SF36). Data were obtained at preoperative, early (<90d), and late (90-365d) follow-up visits. Obese patients were compared with non-obese patients in both unilateral and bilateral reconstructions. Overall, 167 patients were enrolled, with obesity noted in 34% of patients. Obese Unilateral reconstruction patients had lower preoperative UA strength (4.7 vs.4.2, P=0.05) and FIM (6.7 vs. 6.9, P=0.008) scores compared with non-obese patients. These scores significantly worsened in all patients from preoperative to early follow-up, yet scores did not differ at late follow-up between obesity cohorts.